refactor(qa): split Matrix QA into optional plugin (#66723)

Merged via squash.

Prepared head SHA: 27241bd089
Co-authored-by: gumadeiras <5599352+gumadeiras@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gumadeiras <5599352+gumadeiras@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewed-by: @gumadeiras
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo Madeira Santana
2026-04-14 16:28:57 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3425823dfb
commit 82a2db71e8
69 changed files with 2026 additions and 229 deletions

View File

@@ -67,9 +67,13 @@ These commands sit beside the main test suites when you need QA-lab realism:
- Starts the Docker-backed QA site for operator-style QA work.
- `pnpm openclaw qa matrix`
- Runs the Matrix live QA lane against a disposable Docker-backed Tuwunel homeserver.
- This QA host is repo/dev-only today. Packaged OpenClaw installs do not ship
`qa-lab`, so they do not expose `openclaw qa`.
- Repo checkouts can link the in-tree plugin directly:
`openclaw plugins install -l ./extensions/qa-matrix`.
- Provisions three temporary Matrix users (`driver`, `sut`, `observer`) plus one private room, then starts a QA gateway child with the real Matrix plugin as the SUT transport.
- Uses the pinned stable Tuwunel image `ghcr.io/matrix-construct/tuwunel:v1.5.1` by default. Override with `OPENCLAW_QA_MATRIX_TUWUNEL_IMAGE` when you need to test a different image.
- Matrix currently supports only `--credential-source env` because the lane provisions disposable users locally.
- Matrix does not expose shared credential-source flags because the lane provisions disposable users locally.
- Writes a Matrix QA report, summary, and observed-events artifact under `.artifacts/qa-e2e/...`.
- `pnpm openclaw qa telegram`
- Runs the Telegram live QA lane against a real private group using the driver and SUT bot tokens from env.
@@ -170,11 +174,12 @@ Adding a channel to the markdown QA system requires exactly two things:
1. A transport adapter for the channel.
2. A scenario pack that exercises the channel contract.
Do not add a channel-specific QA runner when the shared `qa-lab` runner can
Do not add a new top-level QA command root when the shared `qa-lab` host can
own the flow.
`qa-lab` owns the shared mechanics:
`qa-lab` owns the shared host mechanics:
- the `openclaw qa` command root
- suite startup and teardown
- worker concurrency
- artifact writing
@@ -182,8 +187,9 @@ own the flow.
- scenario execution
- compatibility aliases for older `qa-channel` scenarios
The channel adapter owns the transport contract:
Runner plugins own the transport contract:
- how `openclaw qa <runner>` is mounted beneath the shared `qa` root
- how the gateway is configured for that transport
- how readiness is checked
- how inbound events are injected
@@ -194,17 +200,20 @@ The channel adapter owns the transport contract:
The minimum adoption bar for a new channel is:
1. Implement the transport adapter on the shared `qa-lab` seam.
2. Register the adapter in the transport registry.
3. Keep transport-specific mechanics inside the adapter or the channel harness.
4. Author or adapt markdown scenarios under `qa/scenarios/`.
5. Use the generic scenario helpers for new scenarios.
6. Keep existing compatibility aliases working unless the repo is doing an intentional migration.
1. Keep `qa-lab` as the owner of the shared `qa` root.
2. Implement the transport runner on the shared `qa-lab` host seam.
3. Keep transport-specific mechanics inside the runner plugin or channel harness.
4. Mount the runner as `openclaw qa <runner>` instead of registering a competing root command.
Runner plugins should declare `qaRunners` in `openclaw.plugin.json` and export a matching `qaRunnerCliRegistrations` array from `runtime-api.ts`.
Keep `runtime-api.ts` light; lazy CLI and runner execution should stay behind separate entrypoints.
5. Author or adapt markdown scenarios under `qa/scenarios/`.
6. Use the generic scenario helpers for new scenarios.
7. Keep existing compatibility aliases working unless the repo is doing an intentional migration.
The decision rule is strict:
- If behavior can be expressed once in `qa-lab`, put it in `qa-lab`.
- If behavior depends on one channel transport, keep it in that adapter or plugin harness.
- If behavior depends on one channel transport, keep it in that runner plugin or plugin harness.
- If a scenario needs a new capability that more than one channel can use, add a generic helper instead of a channel-specific branch in `suite.ts`.
- If a behavior is only meaningful for one transport, keep the scenario transport-specific and make that explicit in the scenario contract.