Files
openclaw/docs/plugins/compatibility.md
2026-04-25 10:35:36 -07:00

101 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown

---
summary: "Plugin compatibility contracts, deprecation metadata, and migration expectations"
title: "Plugin compatibility"
read_when:
- You maintain an OpenClaw plugin
- You see a plugin compatibility warning
- You are planning a plugin SDK or manifest migration
---
OpenClaw keeps older plugin contracts wired through named compatibility
adapters before removing them. This protects existing bundled and external
plugins while the SDK, manifest, setup, config, and agent runtime contracts
evolve.
## Compatibility registry
Plugin compatibility contracts are tracked in the core registry at
`src/plugins/compat/registry.ts`.
Each record has:
- a stable compatibility code
- status: `active`, `deprecated`, `removal-pending`, or `removed`
- owner: SDK, config, setup, channel, provider, plugin execution, agent runtime,
or core
- introduction and deprecation dates when applicable
- replacement guidance
- docs, diagnostics, and tests that cover the old and new behavior
The registry is the source for maintainer planning and future plugin inspector
checks. If a plugin-facing behavior changes, add or update the compatibility
record in the same change that adds the adapter.
## Plugin inspector package
The plugin inspector should live outside the core OpenClaw repo as a separate
package/repository backed by the versioned compatibility and manifest
contracts.
The day-one CLI should be:
```sh
openclaw-plugin-inspector ./my-plugin
```
It should emit:
- manifest/schema validation
- the contract compatibility version being checked
- install/source metadata checks
- cold-path import checks
- deprecation and compatibility warnings
Use `--json` for stable machine-readable output in CI annotations. OpenClaw
core should expose contracts and fixtures the inspector can consume, but should
not publish the inspector binary from the main `openclaw` package.
## Deprecation policy
OpenClaw should not remove a documented plugin contract in the same release
that introduces its replacement.
The migration sequence is:
1. Add the new contract.
2. Keep the old behavior wired through a named compatibility adapter.
3. Emit diagnostics or warnings when plugin authors can act.
4. Document the replacement and timeline.
5. Test both old and new paths.
6. Wait through the announced migration window.
7. Remove only with explicit breaking-release approval.
Deprecated records must include a warning start date, replacement, docs link,
and target removal date when known.
## Current compatibility areas
Current compatibility records include:
- legacy broad SDK imports such as `openclaw/plugin-sdk/compat`
- legacy hook-only plugin shapes and `before_agent_start`
- bundled plugin allowlist and enablement behavior
- legacy provider/channel env-var manifest metadata
- activation hints that are being replaced by manifest contribution ownership
- `embeddedHarness` and `agent-harness` naming aliases while public naming moves
toward `agentRuntime`
- generated bundled channel config metadata fallback while registry-first
`channelConfigs` metadata lands
- the persisted plugin registry disable env while repair flows migrate operators
to `openclaw plugins registry --refresh` and `openclaw doctor --fix`
New plugin code should prefer the replacement listed in the registry and in the
specific migration guide. Existing plugins can keep using a compatibility path
until the docs, diagnostics, and release notes announce a removal window.
## Release notes
Release notes should include upcoming plugin deprecations with target dates and
links to migration docs. That warning needs to happen before a compatibility
path moves to `removal-pending` or `removed`.